Attachment Disturbances in Adults by Daniel P. Brown & David S. Elliott: Summary and Key Takeaways
Attachment Disturbances in Adults: Treatment for Comprehensive Repair Daniel P. Brown, PhD & David S. Elliott, PhD | 2016 | Clinical reference
This is not a self-help book. It is a 750-page clinical manual for therapists — the most comprehensive treatment framework for adult attachment disorders currently in print. That said, readers willing to engage with graduate-level content will find something unavailable elsewhere: a complete, research-grounded account of how attachment wounds actually form, what they look like across the full diagnostic spectrum, and what structured therapeutic work is capable of repairing them.
Brown and Elliott's contribution is primarily methodological. Where most attachment books describe patterns and point toward healing, this one describes the mechanisms of change and the specific procedures that drive them. For anyone trying to understand what attachment therapy actually consists of — not the theory but the technique — this is the primary source.
The book's structure
The book divides into three major sections.
The first six chapters cover foundational research: the developmental history of attachment theory, how attachment bonds form in infancy, the four adult attachment prototypes and how they're assessed, and the relationship between insecure attachment and a wide range of psychiatric conditions.
Chapters 7 through 10 present the authors' treatment model — the Three Pillars approach — in full theoretical and practical detail.
Chapters 11 through 18 apply that model to each major attachment classification: dismissing, anxious-preoccupied, and disorganized, including the most severe disorganized subtypes.
Part I: The foundation
How secure attachment forms
Brown and Elliott identify five caregiver behaviors that produce secure attachment, organized as linked pairs of child experience and parental action:
- Felt safety — from consistent, reliable protection from danger and threat
- Being seen and known — from accurate, ongoing attunement to behavior, inner state, and developmental stage
- Felt comfort — from timely soothing and reassurance that the child eventually internalizes as self-regulation
- Feeling valued — from expressed delight in the child as a person (the book's pointed critique: too many parents become focused on the job of parenting over the joy of parenting, preoccupied with what the child does rather than who the child is)
- Support for best self — from unconditional encouragement of exploration and self-discovery
These five conditions aren't separate; they're mutually reinforcing. And they all depend on a substrate of four general factors: physical presence, consistency, reliability, and genuine interest in the child.
The four adult attachment prototypes
The book describes four adult attachment classifications derived from the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) — the gold-standard research instrument for assessing how adults represent their own attachment history.
Secure (F): Coherent, balanced narratives about childhood. Able to acknowledge both positive and negative experiences without idealizing or devaluing. AAI discourse shows flexible, truthful, and relevant speech.
Dismissing (Ds): Idealized descriptions of parents, lacking concrete support. Memory is suppressed or unavailable. The adult presents as self-sufficient and minimizes attachment needs. This develops from caregivers who consistently rejected proximity- and contact-seeking — especially rejection of negative affect.
Preoccupied (E): Enmeshed, passive, or angry narrative about childhood. Adults remain so entangled with early experiences that the past floods present discourse. This develops from caregivers who were unpredictably responsive — who selectively attuned to fear while misattuning to exploration, or who inverted the relationship by involving the child in the caregiver's own state.
Disorganized/Unresolved (CC): Lapses in reasoning or discourse when discussing loss or abuse — sudden shifts to confused, fearful, or dissociated states. This develops when the caregiver who should be the source of safety is simultaneously the source of fear. The child faces an irresolvable paradox: the source of the infant's safety appears at the same time to be a source of danger.
Attachment and psychopathology
One of the book's most clinically significant arguments: the link between disorganized attachment and severe psychopathology is direct and well-supported. Dismissing and preoccupied attachments are associated with elevated anxiety, depression, and personality dysfunction. Disorganized attachment is strongly associated with borderline personality disorder, dissociative identity disorder, complex trauma, and severe addictions.
A critical clinical implication: standard trauma-processing approaches — EMDR, exposure-based work, trauma-focused CBT — are contraindicated for patients with disorganized attachment until the disorganization itself has been addressed. Trauma processing with disorganized patients activates the attachment system without a stable base to contain it, and typically worsens rather than improves functioning. The Three Pillars approach was developed specifically to address this gap.
Part II: The Three Pillars treatment model
Before treatment: clarifying the type of relational disturbance
Brown and Elliott distinguish three types of relational disturbance that can look similar on the surface but require different interventions:
- Attachment disturbance: Formed between 12 and 20 months, before narrative memory develops. Expressed primarily as behavioral reenactments rather than conscious narratives.
- Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT): Develops between ages 3–4, accessible through narrative memory, more responsive to interpretation and insight.
- Trauma bonding: Formed in relationships with power differentials and intermittent harm and care. Can resemble anxious or fearful-avoidant attachment.
Treatment always starts with what formed earliest developmentally. If attachment disturbance is present alongside CCRT patterns, address the attachment layer first.
Pillar 1: Ideal Parent Figure (IPF) protocol
The IPF protocol is the book's central clinical innovation. It is a guided imagery method in which the patient — in a calm, inwardly focused state — imagines being a young child with fictional ideal parent figures: parents who are perfectly suited to them, who provide all five conditions for secure attachment, and who never existed in their actual childhood.
The key theoretical insight: attachment representations formed in the first two years of life are stored in behavioral/implicit memory — below the level at which narrative-based interventions (insight, interpretation, reframing) can reach them. Imagery accesses these representations directly.
The therapist's role in each session is to:
- Help the patient achieve a relaxed, body-focused state
- Invite the patient to imagine ideal parents (explicitly not actual parents)
- Shape the imagery toward the five attachment-promoting conditions
- Mirror and amplify the patient's felt experiences in the imagery
- Anchor positive states in bodily sensation
Crucially, the primary agent of change is the patient's relationship with the imagined figures — not the therapeutic relationship itself. The therapeutic relationship provides a safe container; the imagery is where the new attachment representations are actually built.
The IPF imagery is tailored to each patient's specific history. Using the patient's own descriptions of their early caregivers (often sourced from AAI responses), the therapist identifies the positive opposites of whatever was most developmentally absent and introduces those specific qualities through the imagined figures. A patient who described their mother as "cold" imagines a mother who is warm. A patient whose father was "unpredictable" imagines a father who is consistent and calm. A patient with a frightening caregiver imagines parents who are consistently and fully present, never frightening.
For dismissing patients, imagery specifically emphasizes parents who accept and welcome the child's attachment behaviors and negative affect — exactly what their actual caregivers rejected.
For anxious-preoccupied patients, imagery emphasizes parents who are accurately attuned to the child's internal state without imposing their own needs — directly countering the overinvolving or misattuning caregiving that produced the preoccupied pattern.
For disorganized patients, the most fundamental condition is that the imagined parents are always and completely safe — never a source of fear.
Over time, with repeated sessions, positive experiences with the imagined parent figures accumulate and overwrite the old, insecure internal working models, replacing them with a new map of earned secure attachment.
Pillar 2: Metacognitive development
Secure attachment and metacognitive capacity develop together and reinforce each other. Securely attached children develop the ability to reflect on mental states — their own and others' — through thousands of contingent, attuned interactions with caregivers who hold the child's mind in mind. Insecurely attached children miss much of this scaffolding.
The book traces four generations of metacognition research, culminating in a comprehensive target framework for treatment:
- Basic metacognitive skills: awareness of states of mind, distinguishing fantasy from reality, monitoring one's own thinking
- Intermediate metacognitive skills: recognizing how the past shapes current experience, perspective-taking, context-sensitivity
- Advanced metacognitive skills: simultaneous awareness of self and other, coherence of mind, recognition of interdependence, orientation toward a wider life purpose
Clinical tools for building these capacities include:
- Mentalizing prompts: asking patients to wonder about their own and others' mental states, motivations, and needs
- Anchoring scales: 1–10 ratings for degree of awareness, organization of mind, past/present orientation, self/other focus
- Affect marking: the therapist verbally emphasizes and locates the patient's emotional experience: "You must have felt really afraid"
- Stop-and-stand techniques: interrupting discourse to focus on the moment of rupture and reinstate mentalizing
Pillar 3: Collaborative behavior
Collaborative capacity — the human ability to engage in mutualistic activity with joint goals and shared intentionality — is an innate developmental potential that insecure attachment arrests. Brown and Elliott frame the relative absence of collaborative behavior in insecurely attached patients not as a missing skill but as a developmental arrest awaiting corrective conditions.
Treatment addresses collaboration at three levels:
Nonverbal collaboration: The therapist systematically observes the patient's body posture, gaze, facial displays, vocal rhythm, and breathing for attachment-specific profiles (dismissing patients sit back, avert gaze, use muted affect; preoccupied patients sit forward, stare hypervigilantly, talk over the therapist). Through match-and-change techniques, the therapist gradually shifts these patterns toward synchronization and contingent responsiveness.
Verbal collaboration: Insecure attachment consistently violates the rules of cooperative discourse. Dismissing patients idealize without evidence and speak too little. Preoccupied patients ramble, go off-topic, and are vague. Disorganized patients may violate all basic rules of coherent speech. The therapist teaches the rules explicitly, provides immediate feedback on violations, and models collaborative communication.
Treatment-frame collaboration: The therapeutic relationship itself is established as a genuinely collaborative partnership through mutual negotiation, full transparency about diagnosis and treatment rationale, and a written treatment frame contract.
The three pillars are interdependent
Each pillar strengthens the other two:
- IPF imagery activates metacognitive awareness (the patient notices how the imagined parent's attunement affects their state of mind)
- Metacognitive development supports collaborative behavior (the patient can observe and modify their own noncollaborative patterns)
- Collaborative work provides a safe relational context for IPF imagery to unfold
- When alliance ruptures occur, shifting from the attachment system to the collaborative system allows repair even when the patient has pulled back from the therapeutic relationship entirely
Part III: What to expect by attachment type
Dismissing attachment in treatment
The dismissing patient arrives with a deactivated attachment system. They are self-sufficient, emotionally constricted, often intellectually capable but disconnected from internal experience. Early attempts to engage their attachment system directly are typically met with bewilderment or avoidance.
The recommended approach: begin through the cooperative behavioral system. Establish the therapy as a collaborative project with shared goals. Only as trust and relational safety accumulate does the attachment system begin to reactivate — and when it does, the primary clinical sign is the patient's experience of longing for connection. This longing is frequently accompanied by conflict, anxiety, and shame.
The therapist's task at that juncture is to normalize the longing: "This longing is expected, natural, and normal — and something deeply positive in that it serves as the basis of human connection."
IPF imagery for dismissing patients specifically emphasizes parents who accept and welcome proximity-seeking and negative affect. The "strong, autonomous, independent pseudo-self" of the dismissing patient is gradually transformed into a best-self-in-the-context-of-relationship.
Anxious-preoccupied attachment in treatment
The preoccupied patient arrives with a hyperactivated attachment system — scanning the therapist's face for signs of the therapist's state of mind, oriented outside-in (reading others to determine how to be) rather than inside-out (attending to their own internal experience).
A core therapeutic reorientation: "You keep looking to me to see what I expect, so what I expect is that we both keep looking at you and your state of mind."
IPF imagery for preoccupied patients emphasizes consistent attunement to the child's inner state and vitality affects — and crucially, parents who attend to the child without involving the child in the parent's own needs. The imagery allows the patient to experience what it would have been like to never have to worry about the parent's state of mind.
Progress is marked by the patient's developing capacity to sustain self-exploration — attending to their own experience — without hyperactivation of the attachment system.
Disorganized attachment in treatment
This is the most technically demanding section of the book and the area where the Three Pillars model makes its most distinctive contribution.
For disorganized patients, activating the attachment system directly in early treatment often worsens functioning rather than improving it. The core of the disorganized pattern is that attachment figures were simultaneously needed and threatening — the child could neither approach safely nor withdraw safely. Recreating this in therapy by serving primarily as an attachment figure triggers the original disorganization.
The clinical solution: establish the cooperative behavioral system first. Frame the therapist-patient relationship as a collaborative team working toward shared goals. Only when sufficient safety and collaborative capacity are established does direct attachment work become viable.
IPF imagery for disorganized patients is built around one fundamental condition above all others: the imagined parents are consistently, completely safe. Never frightening. Never a source of fear. This simple quality — so basic it would be unremarkable to a securely attached person — is the specific corrective experience disorganized patients most lack.
What "earned secure attachment" actually means
The concept of earned security runs throughout the book. A person with earned security was not raised with secure attachment — but has, through therapy or life experience, developed the internal capacities that characterize it: coherent narrative, metacognitive flexibility, affect regulation, and a stable inner sense of being valued and connected.
The measurable indicators: on a re-administered Adult Attachment Interview following treatment, the patient scores as secure — coherent, balanced, able to acknowledge the full complexity of their early experience without idealization or unresolved flooding.
This is what the authors mean by "comprehensive repair" — not the improvement of symptoms, not the management of triggers, but the actual reorganization of the attachment system itself.
Who this book is for
This is graduate-level clinical reading. It is dense, technical in places, and structured for therapists. The most productive readers will likely be those who already have some background in attachment theory and want to understand what attachment-informed treatment actually consists of mechanically.
For readers without that background, the book's foundational chapters on attachment theory and adult prototypes (Chapters 1–3) are among the clearest research summaries available. The Five Primary Conditions framework and the three-pillar model are sufficiently well-explained to be useful to informed non-clinicians.
For anyone who has engaged extensively with attachment theory and is wondering what's left after insight and understanding — why reading more about avoidant attachment doesn't seem to move the underlying pattern — the answer Brown and Elliott give is consistent: insight operates at the level of narrative memory, but attachment representations were formed before narrative memory existed. The work that reaches them is experiential, repetitive, and body-based. Understanding is necessary but not sufficient. This book describes what the sufficient part looks like.
Related reading: Attachment in Psychotherapy takes a more relational approach to similar territory. The Power of Attachment offers an accessible, somatic version of attachment healing for lay readers. A Secure Base by Bowlby provides the foundational concepts this book builds on.
Was this article helpful?